Could electricity change the face of firefighting?
March 27, 2011: Scientists have described a discovery that could underpin a new genre of firefighting devices, including sprinkler systems that suppress fires not with water, but with zaps of electric current, without soaking and damaging the contents of a home, business, or other structure.
Reporting at the 241st National Meeting and Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS), Ludovico Cademartiri, PhD, and his colleagues in the group of George M Whitesides, PhD, at Harvard University, picked up on a 200-year-old observation that electricity can affect the shape of flames, making them bend, twist, turn, flicker, and even snuffing them out.
However, little research had been done over the years on the phenomenon.
“Controlling fires is an enormously difficult challenge,” said Cademartiri.“Our research has shown that by applying large electric fields we can suppress flames very rapidly. We’re very excited about the results of this relatively unexplored area of research.”
The new technology could allow firefighters to extinguish fires remotely – without delivering material to the flame – and to suppress fires from a distance. The technology could also save water and avoid the use of firefighting materials that might potentially harm the environment, the scientists suggest.
In the new study, the researchers connected a powerful electrical amplifier to a wand-like probe and used the device to shoot beams of electricity at an open flame more than a foot high. Almost instantly, the flame was snuffed out. Much to their fascination, it worked time and time again.
The device consisted of a 600-watt amplifier, using about the same power as a high-end car stereo system. However, Cademartiri believes that a power source with only a tenth of this wattage could have similar flame-suppressing effect. That could be a boon to firefighters, since it would enable use of portable flame-tamer devices, which perhaps could be hand-carried or fit into a backpack.
But how does it work? Cademartiri acknowledged that the phenomenon is complex, with several effects occurring simultaneously. Among these effects, it appears that carbon particles, or soot, generated in the flame are key for its response to electric fields. Soot particles can easily become charged. The charged particles respond to the electric field, affecting the stability of flames.
“Combustion is first and foremost a chemical reaction – arguably one of the most important – but it’s been somewhat neglected by most of the chemical community,” said Cademartiri. “We’re trying to get a more complete picture of this very complex interaction.”
He envisions that futuristic electrical devices based on the phenomenon could be fixed on the ceilings of buildings or ships, similar to stationary water sprinklers now in use. Alternatively, firefighters might carry the flame-tamer in the form of a backpack and distribute the electricity to fires using a hand-held wand. Such a device could be used, for instance, to make a path for firefighters to enter a fire or to create an escape path for people to exit, he said.
The system shows particular promise for fighting fires in enclosed quarters, such as armoured trucks, planes, and submarines. Large forest fires, which spread over much larger areas, are not as suitable for the technique, he noted.
Cademartiri also reported how he and his colleagues found that electrical waves can control the heat and distribution of flames. As a result, the technology could potentially improve the efficiency of a wide variety of technologies that involve controlled combustion, including car engines, power plants, and welding and cutting torches, he said.
This study was funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (US Department of Defence) and the US Department of Energy.